Home | Search | Login
Hoy April 17, 2014, 5:17 pm Havana time.
Hide Menu
12/07/13 - Reuters - Historic global trade deal on ice as Cuba holds out 

UPDATE 5-Historic global trade deal on ice as Cuba holds out

* Would be first worldwide reform since WTO's creation
* India withdraws objections
* Cuban delegate shouts at WTO chief Azevedo
* Diplomats had expected Cuba to object and then give way (Updates after
meeting is adjourned overnight)

By Randy Fabi

NUSA DUA, Indonesia, Dec 7 (Reuters) - Ministers appeared close to sealing
the world's biggest trade reform for two decades early on Saturday but a
last-gasp objection from Cuba forced an overnight halt, leaving the World
Trade Organization four votes short of a final victory.

Earlier a major obstacle was overcome when India, the most vocal holdout,
endorsed a draft text presented by the head of the WTO Roberto Azevedo,
putting the WTO tantalisingly close to agreement. But Cuba, backed by
Venezuela, Bolivia and Nicaragua, refused to accept a deal that would not
help pry open the U.S. embargo of the Caribbean island.

The deal, thrashed out at talks on the Indonesian island of Bali, would
lower trade barriers and speed up the passage of goods through customs.
Analysts estimate that over time it could boost the world economy by
hundreds of billions of dollars and create more than 20 million jobs,
mostly in developing countries.

Cuba wants language in the WTO deal to challenge the embargo, which has
been in place for half a century and been condemned 22 times by the United
Nations. President Barack Obama said last month it may be time to revise
the U.S. policy.

The Cuban veto appeared to be the last possible obstacle in a three-month
rollercoaster of late-night negotiations that has frequently flirted with
collapse and occasionally ended in a 5 a.m. cliffhanger.

Failure would represent a body blow to the 159-nation WTO, formed in 1995
and still without a major trade deal to its credit after many years of
negotiating fiascos.

The deal requires unanimous support, so any member can wield a veto.
Earlier Cuba's representative banged the table and shouted at Azevedo after
the meeting where the draft agreement was distributed, a participant at the
meeting said.

That contrasted with the sudden evaporation of objections from Indian Trade
Minister Anand Sharma, who embraced U.S. Trade Representative Michael
Froman at the same meeting.

"It is a victory for the WTO and for the global community to have arrived
at a mature decision," Indian Trade Minister Anand Sharma told reporters,
as a deal seemed close. "We are more than happy. It is a great day. It is a
historic day."

The key issue for India was a compromise on food subsidies, since it has
announced a massive programme for stockpiling food to feed to the poor, in
breach of the WTO rules on subsidies.

Cuba has been consistently demanding the United States lift its economic
embargo as part of the Bali agreement, but many trade diplomats said it had
made the same demand for decades and they do not expect it to block a deal.

The WTO delegations in Bali will reconvene at 10 a.m. (0200 GMT) to see if
Azevedo has found a way of making the text acceptable to all 159 members,
including Cuba and the United States.


Azevedo, a Brazilian diplomat, took the helm of the WTO in September and
immediately launched a punishing regime of round-the-clock talks and
"whatever works" diplomacy. He has brought the organisation to within a
whisker of success, even though the outcome appeared in grave doubt as
recently as Thursday.

If agreed, the reform would slash red tape at customs around the world,
give improved terms of trade to the poorest countries, and allow developing
countries to skirt the normal rules on farm subsidies if they are trying to
feed the poor.

It would also revive confidence in the WTO's ability to negotiate global
trade deals, after it consistently failed to clinch agreement in the Doha
round of talks that started in 2001 and proved hugely over-ambitious.

As the Doha round stuttered to a halt, momentum shifted away from global
trade pacts in favour of regional deals such as the Trans-Pacific
Partnership that the United States is negotiating with 11 other countries,
and a similar agreement it is pursuing bilaterally with the European Union.

Failure in Bali would have led to a more divided world, with regional blocs
reversing the WTO's globalising goals, some experts say.

The "Bali package" now on the table secures a handful of elements of the
Doha round that were thought to be doable and declares a "strong resolve"
to pursue agreement on the rest.

India's concerns that the Bali deal would give only a temporary shield to
its food stockpile plan were resolved with wording that promised a search
for a more permanent solution.

"The food security fix is something out of 1984, George Orwell would be
proud," said Simon Evenett, professor of international trade at the Swiss
University of St Gallen.

"The food security text is so contradictory that there must be an informal
understanding among the big players as to what it really means."

Many diplomats had predicted Sharma, whose government is entering a
bruising electoral battle, would use Bali as a platform where India could
be seen to stand against the rich world in defence of the poor.

But India was under pressure to accept an eventual compromise, because
failure of the Bali package would leave its food subsidy programme exposed
to trade disputes that could lead to billions of dollars in trade

The meat of the Bali deal is an agreement known in WTO jargon as "trade
facilitation": streamlining and standardising customs and port procedures
to speed trade globally.

A study by the Washington, D.C.-based Peterson Institute of International
Economics estimated it would inject $960 billion into the global economy
and create 21 million jobs, 18 million of them in developing countries.
(Additional reporting by Tom Miles in Geneva; writing by Tom Miles; editing
by Andrew Roche)

Original Source / Fuente Original:


This server contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of Cuba's political, economic, human rights, international, cultural, educational, scientific, sports and historical issues, among others. We distribute the materials on the basis of a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. The material is distributed without profit. The material should be used for information, research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/ uscode/17/107.shtml.